Today’s news:

A hill too far

The Brooklyn Paper

State environmental officials — who have already rejected a key design element in the Brooklyn Bridge Park development — are now taking an extra long look at another key feature, embolding foes of the project.

Complaints about the 30-foot-tall, sound-reducing hills, or berms, on the Furman Street side of the site provoked the state Department of Environmental Conservation last month to extend the public comment period on the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation’s application for a permit to build on state wetlands.

That public comment period ended on Wednesday.

“The berms take up space that could be used for actual parkland,” said Bob Stone, a member of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Defense Fund, which has opposed the state development project in favor of what it calls a “real” park that would not have residential units in its footprint. “The berms are going to be very steep and it won’t be possible to do anything on them.”

Brooklyn Bridge Park planners flatly rejected that notion and assert that the landscaped ridges are indispensable because they will block noise from the nearby Brooklyn–Queens Expressway.

“The berms are carefully designed to create a park environment on a site that is very flat, and to attenuate the noise,” said Warner Johnston, a spokesman for the Brooklyn Bridge Park Development Corporation.

A denial from the Department of Environmental Conservation could plunge the development into chaos if its architects are forced to significantly redesign the layout. And winning the agency’s approval is more than a mere formality. Earlier this year, for example, DEC nixed plans for walkways between the piers, citing the potential for damage to aquatic life.

Critics have also petitioned the agency to smite wave attenuators from the plan. The project’s development agency has said such wave-calmers are needed to create a safe setting for novice kayakers. The voices clamoring for the removal of the attenuators counter that the barriers limit the ability of more experienced boaters to navigate the river.

“Kayakers were especially chagrined at the inclusion of wave-breaks as they feel the enjoyment of this sport depends on the waves,” the Defense Fund wrote in its public testimony.

Of course, the wave attenuators may be a moot point, because the boating area is omitted from the current park construction schedule due to a lack of money.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

al pankin from downtown says:
by the time they finish this the old docks will have landmark status...
Nov. 26, 2008, 10:13 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.