Today’s news:

Marty: Yes on Dock Street (sort of)

Two Trees Management says its proposal is in context with other buildings in DUMBO.
The Brooklyn Paper

Borough President Markowitz announced that he supports a DUMBO developer’s controversial residential tower, defying opponents who say the 18-story building would obstruct views of the Brooklyn Bridge — but his approval is conditional on a redesign of the building.

In supporting David and Jed Walentases’ Dock Street project, Markowitz recommended that the developers actually make their building taller — albeit thinner — to lessen its supposed impact on views of Roebling’s fabled span.

“I share community concerns that the iconic views of the Brooklyn Bridge … must be protected,” Markowitz wrote to the Department of City Planning.

“I have heard the community loud and clear,” he added, though also making it clear that he supports a rezoning that would pave the way for the 375-unit project, which currently calls for an 18-story tower, a public middle school, a parking lot and 70 below-market-rate rentals.

“I agree with the developer that residential development and parking would be appropriate usage,” he added.

But on Thursday night, Markowitz was a bit more feisty with the Brooklyn Heights Association.

“Let me make it clear — I do not accept this project as it is presented,” he said. “But this is the balance that we strive so hard to make.”

To protect views, Markowitz suggested that the Walentases erect a slimmer building that would rise 25 stories — seven more than the current proposal.

A more slender tower would “reduce 57 percent of its girth,” Markowitz said in a statement. Such a configuration would, he added, “respect the iconic Brooklyn Bridge by not allowing a ‘rival’ structure to rise too close to it [and] preserve public views.”

In addition to the redesign, the Beep, whose role in the city’s land use review process is advisory, recommended that the developers set their high-rise back 70 feet from Front Street, which would increase the distance from the tower to the bridge from 98 to 150 feet.

The borough president also suggested that the developers sign a binding agreement to reserve 20 percent of the housing units as below-market-rate rentals — a figure that the Walentases have promised.

Markowitz’s decision to back the project comes on the heels of a contentious January meeting, where dozens of opponents and a smaller group of supporters clashed in an attempt to sway the Beep. Opponents not only included neighborhood residents, but also historian David McCullouch, who sent a statement likening the vista of the bridge to a national treasure.

Jed Walentas — a principal at Two Trees Management — celebrated Markowitz’s decision.

“We are pleased that the Brooklyn borough president is supportive of the Dock Street DUMBO rezoning, and will carefully consider his comments,” he said. “It is wonderful that Borough President Markowitz has added his voice to the chorus of support for the Dock Street DUMBO proposal.”

The Dock Street project has already won a key approval from Community Board 2, even though the board’s land-use committee had rejected the proposal as ruinous of the views of the bridge.

Earlier this year, a Brooklyn Paper investigation determined that concerns about obstructed views of the bridge were largely exaggerated.

The project will next be considered by the Department of City Planning, and finally voted on by the city Council — where Dock Street opponents include David Yassky (D–Brooklyn Heights) and Bill DeBlasio (D–Park Slope). Another area lawmaker, Councilwoman Tish James (D–Fort Greene), said she supported the project because it includes a much-desired middle school — a concession by the developer that could save the city $50 million in school construction costs.

Brooklynites who oppose the project were shocked and dismayed by Markowitz’s decision.

“It’s disturbing and it’s disgusting,” said Sheryl Buckholtz, head of the DUMBO Neigborhood Association. “This is a tragic day for all Brooklyn communities.”

UPDATED AT 3:40 PM ON FEB. 27: Story was altered to reflect a bit more subtlety in Borough President Markowitz’s position. The initial version of this story was published before the Beep spoke to the Brooklyn Heights Association on Thursday night.

Pin It
Print this story Permalink

Reader Feedback

harry from slope says:
so this is the st anns spot isnt it? are they the new tenant in the BAM's development just behind the BAM?
Feb. 27, 2009, 8:26 am
Chris Bastian from Brooklyn Heights says:
I heard Marty speak at the BHA meeting last night, and what this article omits, and opponents need to remember, is that the Developer has an "AS OF RIGHT" ability to build a 25-30 story hotel or other property on the site. If people want the bulk and position adjusted, a negotiated deal is going to be necessary.
Feb. 27, 2009, 2:05 pm
sid from Boerum Hill says:
No one can finance a hotel at this site. Its a red herring.
Feb. 27, 2009, 2:43 pm
Clyde from Brooklyn says:
Was the Brooklyn Paper even at the BHA meeting last night?
Feb. 27, 2009, 8:31 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Links