Sections

Gil Hodges: Hall of Famer or near miss? The debate rages

Gil Hodges — Hall-worthy?
The Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Is Gil Hodges Hall-worthy, or isn’t he?

Last week’s rejection of the legendary Dodger player and Mets manager by the National Baseball Hall of Fame renews a decades-long argument that Hodges deserves the game’s top honor.

On the plus side: Hodges was an eight-time All Star, knocked in more runs during the 1950s than any other National Leaguer, won two World Series championships as a player, and, of course, managed the Amazin’ Mets to their still-unbelievable 1969 title.

On the negative side: Hodges wasn’t the premier first basemen of his generation, or even the most talented member of the Boys of Summer. His career statistics — a .273 lifetime batting average, 370 home runs, and 1,274 runs batted in — are comparable to good-but-not-great players such as Yankees first basemen Tino Martinez who batted .271 over his career with 339 home runs and 1,271 RBIs (and when was the last time you heard a Yankee fan argue credibly that Tino Martinez should be enshrined?).

Citing Hodges’s less-than-legendary stats, baseball historian Thomas Gilbert said the legendary Bum is just a “notch below” the game’s all-time greats.

“Hodges was a great hitter, but he just isn’t worthy of the Hall of Fame,” said Gilbert, who’s penned 13 books on the national pastime.

Gilbert said most Hall of Famers — like, say, New York Giants center fielder Willie Mays — were the best at their position during their prime, as well as the most dominant hitters on their team and perennial candidates for the Most Valuable Player award.

But in his peak years, Hodges was outshined at first base by St. Louis Cardinals slugger Stan Musial; considered the fourth-best hitter on the Dodgers, after Duke Snider, Roy Campanella and Jackie Robinson; and never came closing to winning an MVP trophy.

Neverthless pro-Hodges experts were quick to defend the former Marine, who was beloved by teammates and fans for his quiet demeanor, work ethic and leadership skills, but who has consistently fallen short of the necessary votes needed for enshrinement in Cooperstown since he first became eligible in 1969.

“It’s not fair for him to be penalized because he wasn’t the best player on his team — that argument is ridiculous,” said Dan Schlossberg, an authority at the Society for American Baseball Research. “Hodges’s accomplishments both as a hitter and fielder merit his being in the Hall of Fame.”

And you know which side the borough’s ultimate Dodger fan, Borough President Markowitz, is on.

“I’m flabbergasted [that] the Hall of Fame has chosen to overlook the spectacular career and contributions of Gil Hodges,” the Beep said in a statement. “Hodges is baseball royalty in Brooklyn, and … deserves to be enshrined in the Hall of Fame for contributing so much to the game of baseball.”

Worst of all, vanquished Dodger fans used to always say, “Wait ’til next year” after their team fell to the Yankees in the World Series. In this case, Hodges must wait three years for his name to return to the “Golden Era Committee” ballot.

Wait ’til 2014!

Reach reporter Daniel Bush at dbush@cnglocal.com or by calling (718) 260-8310. Follow him at twitter.com/dan_bush.

Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Get our stories in your inbox, free.

Like The Brooklyn Paper on Facebook.

Reader Feedback

Danny Peary says:
The argument that Stan Musial was the premier NL first baseman during Hodges' peak years is totally wrong. Hodges peak years were 1949-1957, with another great year in 1959. Musial played 149 games at 1B in 1947, but didn't play more than 100 games at that position again until 1955 and 1956, and then played only 110 and 103 times respectively. He was still playing a lot in the outfield. Musial was an All-Star at 1B in 1950, 1957, 1958, 1959. Kluszewski had a few great years but overall Hodges was THE top NL first baseman during his peak years. Other reasons for his induction into the Hall of Fame will be found in an upcoming bio that I coauthored, due in August.
Jan. 18, 2012, 1:43 am
Ralph Holten from Alaska says:
Any true baseball fan that thinks Gil Hodges is short of the HOF, must be pretty young.
Nov. 22, 2013, 8:53 pm

Enter your comment below

By submitting this comment, you agree to the following terms:

You agree that you, and not BrooklynPaper.com or its affiliates, are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening or sexually-oriented material or any material that may violate applicable law; doing so may lead to the removal of your post and to your being permanently banned from posting to the site. You grant to BrooklynPaper.com the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and fully sublicensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part world-wide and to incorporate it in other works in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.